Welcome back, Mafud.
At 9:14 PM -08002/10/03, Matt Greene wrote, or at least typed: >> >While it may be obvious that one 35mm print or another >may be discernable from Medium Format, a properly >exposed, properly focused 35mm negative, say Portra >160, when properly printed, can easily rival a poorly >exposed, poorly focused medium format negative. >As you noted, the enlarger easel and enlarger head >must be properly aligned to get the maximaboutom >either. > >The talk aobut "grain" always bothers me. "Grain" is >purely subjective. Some prints are absolutely horrid >(most B&W images) without "grain". Then again, >printing on textured paper defeats "grain" argument >every time. >"Grain", like "saturated colors" is, for all intents >and purposes, an affectation of purists and slide film >shooters. Print film users tend not to make such a >fuss about "grain". > >Besides, a little "grain" never hurt an ugly Bride. > > >===== > >Matt Greene > >I get it done with YAHOO! DSL! -- Douglas Forrest Brewer Ashwood Lake Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alphoto.com
