On 1 Mar 2003 at 15:25, Mike Johnston wrote: > This statement contains a premise that I don't think has been demonstrated > yet. It's still an assumption, and may not be correct. We only have two > full-frame DSLRs. One is 11 mp and the other is just now out on the market. I > don't think there's sufficient basis for concluding that a 35mm-sized sensor is > inherently better than an APS-sized sensor, EVEN IF you _had_ made real-world > comparisons, which I know you haven't. There are just too many other variables > involved at present to support such a conclusion.
I had written a multi-page monologue reply to your comments but I have set it aside. I've opted for the basic approach: Lets just assume that in the case of APS vs 35mm sized sensors similar physics pixies are at work that make 67 a more resolute and higher quality yielding media than 35mm film (all else being equal of course). Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
