http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto/why.html

And I agree, if you can not tell the difference in a side by side comparison
of 8x10 you need to see a good ophthalmologist.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


----- Original Message -----
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:59 PM
Subject: RE: 35mm SUCKS! Try 4X5


> I can see a difference in my 8.5X11"s between
> 35mm, 67 & 4X5. The main differences are in
> sharpness, microcontrast, and grain.
> You dont need to go to huge prints to see the differences
> although it does make the differences more apparent
> when you go 11X14, 13 X19, or larger.
>
> Another big advantage of 4X5 is you can crop
> more if desired and still end up with excellent
> results. Not really true with 35mm...
>
> JCO
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Apilado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:19 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: 35mm SUCKS! Try 4X5
> >
> >
> > I've got some very good 8 X 10's from print film shot on 35mm.
> > Even have an
> > 11 X 14.  I don't have the patience to work with sheet film.  Got an old
> > camera at a swap meet that uses 5 X 7 film.  The seller loaded some film
> > into a couple of film holders and I went out and tried it.  Many steps
> > involve with shooting sheet film.  I have to hand to folks that
> > do this type
> > of photography.
> > My medium format photography is done with a 645 Pentax.  The 6 X 7 is
too
> > big for my small hands, and I don't like the weight.
> >
> > Jim A.
> >
> > > From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:16:51 -0500
> > > To: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: RE: 35mm SUCKS! Try 4X5
> > > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:16:55 -0500
> > >
> > > I said 4X5 wasnt for everthing didnt I???
> > > Print quality of 35mm suffers once you go
> > > bigger than 4X6 compared to larger formats.
> > > JCO
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:54 AM
> > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Subject: Re: 35mm SUCKS! Try 4X5
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Try carying 4x5 (or 6x7) setup around with you, on your shoulder,
> > >> for a few
> > >> hours, for a few days, and I am pretty sure print quality and
> > >> flexibility of
> > >> ME-S with a single 50mm lens will start looking very appealing.
> > >> OTOH, Rolleicord is a completely different story... :)
> > >> Mishka, who just came back from a vacation in Barcelona.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to