No matter how good the sample is, it simply cannot exceed the performance that its designers bestowed on it. The 'on-paper' design is the best it can be, manufacturing tolerances or wear-and-tear will always move the lens to a lower performance level.
regards, Anthony Farr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (snip) > Arnold about 85/2: > > >I can explain his low resolution numbers only by guessing that he > >had a bad sample. > > Or you had a better than average sample. > (snip)
