You will have to ask Jerome. He came up with it. I just quoted his little joke that he repeated several times, the point was he liked the camera maybe more than the rest of us.
Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:53 PM Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses) > Tom, > where did that figure $1500 come from? > Hmmm.... > Jostein > ----------------------------- > Pictures at: http://oksne.net > ----------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:02 PM > Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial > Coverage Lenses) > > > > By the way, you can add Jerome to that list, he was only there one day, > but > > we had to pry the camera from his hands just to try it our selves. His > > comment on the camera was, "I thought this was a free program, but its > going > > to end up costing me $1500". > > > > Ciao, > > Graywolf > > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:30 PM > > Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial > > Coverage Lenses) > > > > > > > It makes me happy to see Tom, TV, Bill and Mark so enthusiastic about > the > > > *ist-D. I've pretty much committed to going 100% digital and seeing the > > > results of the camera in "real-world" use, combined with their praise > > gives > > > me the confidence to buy the camera without a second thought. > > > > > > Christian > > > (ignoring Pal's negativity; personally I think it is a decent looking > > camera > > > with all the features I could hope for) > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:14 PM > > > Subject: RE: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial > > > Coverage Lenses) > > > > > > > > > > Me too. If Pentax were to spend a bit on marketing the *istD, it > could > > > > be a real winner. Just the small size and AA battery use give it a > big > > > > advantage, IMNHO. > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > <snip Pal's negativity> > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:39 PM > > > Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial > > > Coverage Lenses) > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Mark. > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > > Graywolf > > > > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto > > > > > > > I got to use an *ist-D quite a bit last weekend and I disagree > strongly > > > > with both of those points. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mark Roberts > > > > Photography and writing > > > > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.509 / Virus Database: 306 - Release Date: 8/12/03 > > > > > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.509 / Virus Database: 306 - Release Date: 8/12/03
