Pal has made up his mind about *ist-D the day it was announced; and that is before he has touched the camera or seen the camera in person. Shouldn't we make our decision after taking some pictures with it?
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: > >I'm afraid I'm not very optimistic regarding the *ist D's fate in the > >marketplace. There are three fundamental problems with the camera: > >1) it is not entry level enough to make an impact. By this I mean it is > >just a "me too" compared to the D10 and the D100 and has no obvious > >price advantage compared to those. It will face hard competition from > >forthcoming, cheaper DSLR's. 2) Design. The *istD is ugly with no design > >flair thats going to convince anyone. > > I got to use an *ist-D quite a bit last weekend and I disagree strongly > with both of those points. -- --Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4--
