Hi! Just by the way, getting a critique on one photographs should help them to extract more from their equipment and learn/advance a technique they are using.
So, at least by the above reason we might need to increase PUG critique volume <grin and duck>. Boris ===8<==============Original message text=============== LW> I've gotten into commenting on the PUG here on PDML in the LW> last few months. Let's face it, the _vast_ majority of PDML LW> posts are technoweenie posts, and I'm as guilty as anyone. LW> But the PUG shots let us see a different side of each other: LW> The camera-eye side. And that is very nifty. I agree with LW> AnnaSan that PUG comments should be a bigger part of the PDML. LW> Ann Sanfedele wrote: >> "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: >>> >>>Actually, there is very little comment on the PUG sumissions any more, >>>compared to what occured some time ago. I think that more comments from more >>>PDMLers would be beneficial to all concerned, even if the comments got a bit >>>"nasty" at times. We're all adults, capable of submitting photos to a >>>"professional" themed gallery, and we can take criticism that is base on >>>photographic ideas and values. >> >> >> We don't really know there are not a lot of comments -- remember people can >> comment directly to the photographers individually. I think, on the whole, that >> is >> a much better idea. >> >> annsan >> >> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
