Hi!
In light of recent tripod talk the following thought occured in my
mind.
The smaller sensor/film is, the worse is the effect of shake. This is
because even small motion of the camera while shutter is open would
translate in larger effect relative to the frame size. Also, smaller
film/sensor would mean that magnification necessary to obtain even
moderately large print is bigger. Hence less than optimal sharpness
would become more apparent.
I also noticed William Robb mentioned microscope that he was using to
see the difference in sharpness between various shooting conditions. I
think that in real world and for amateur photography still very good
pictures could be taken without tripod. Though of course, tripod, MLU,
cable release, etc are advisable.
Hope I am not out of whack <grin>.
Boris
- Re: Tripod use - hard lenses and soft films or the other wa... Boris Liberman
- Re: Tripod use - hard lenses and soft films or the oth... William Robb
- Re: Tripod use - hard lenses and soft films or the... Boris Liberman
- Re: Tripod use - William Robb
- Re: Tripod use - Boris Liberman
- Re: Tripod use - Lon Williamson
- Re: Tripod use - hard lenses and soft films or the oth... William Robb
- Re: Tripod use - hard lenses and soft films or the oth... Eactivist