I know it's not quite the same, but that's exactly why I bought my M-42 SMC Takumar 105mm f/2.8. This is a jewel of a lens, and no imposition to any sort of use. Small and capable.
Goes with me most places I go. Of course, I always have an M-42 to K adapter in my kit [doesn't everyone?] and it's most useful... keith whaley graywolf wrote: > > Which is why I bought your M100/2.8, Stan. Somehow my Tokina ATX > 80-200/2.8 did not seem to be the lens to use for steet portraits. > > Stan Halpin wrote: > > > > As others have noted, it is heavy. However, it does have a tripod mount > > which, combined with a monopod, makes it quite usable for long periods. It > > is big, gets a lot of attention, and could be intimidating. Probably not a > > choice for stealth street candids. > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com
