> Personally, I don't care either. The camera is nice, though not perfect. I > have plenty of lenses to use, and if I can't use a few of my K/M lenses, so > what? > I went through many years as a photographer with just a 50mm lens, and did > some of my very best work with it. > I still have a few (dozen) film cameras that I can use, if I want to, and I > can use my older lenses on bodies that they are contemporaneous with. > > Life is far too short to worry about things of little importance. K/M lens > compatability falls into that category. > For me it became a "so what?" issue when I picked up the ist D. > > William Robb > >
I'm with you on this Wheatfield. Although my *ist D may have to be replaced under warranty, I find it to be a great little camera. Also, since I'm old enough to know how to use a hand held meter, I find the K/M compatability issue to be a non-issue. The few I have work just fine in manual mode. I can hardly wait for a chance to try out my M100/4.0 Macro on it. Bill
