graywolf wrote: > Ann, you should check with them about how they define publication. It could > differ a lot form generally held ideas about that. > > In my opinion both the PUG and your Website would be considered publication as > they are widely available to the public, but the Smithsonian may not be so > inclusive.
Sadly, that was my feeling as well.- As Shel mentioned he successfully got a reply , even though he got two DIFFERENT replies, I will do so before I enter anything, for sure. (I went ahead and put what I thought I might enter into the Dec PUG) (not like I'm putting any heat on myself :) ) annsan The cheeky New Yorker > > -- > > Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > Smithsonian contest coming up - > > One of the rules is " No previously published > > works". Is a photo in the PUG > > considered published? Is a photo on my homepage > > previously published? > > > > One of the other "rules" is one is not allowed to > > contact them about the > > contest submissions and they won't be responsible > > for illegal submissions. > > > > Ugh. > > > > > > annsan the puzzled > > > > > > > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com > > "You might as well accept people as they are, > you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
