On 17 Nov 2003 at 12:34, graywolf wrote: > Ann, you should check with them about how they define publication. It could > differ a lot form generally held ideas about that. > > In my opinion both the PUG and your Website would be considered publication as > they are widely available to the public, but the Smithsonian may not be so > inclusive.
In the broadest definition to publish is to make (an item/article etc) known to a third party there is absolutely no reference to print/payment of the validity of any particular media. The Smithsonian might have their own definition (which isn't defined it seems) and I guess I'd submit regardless however I wouldn't cry if a prize was revoked after the issue of prior publication was raised. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
