There's something to be said for not putting all your eggs (images) in one basket. Why not buy two more 1GB CF cards? Just yesterday all you could shoot on a roll of film was 36 pictures. Changing CF cards every 70 (or even every 35) shots is not that time consuming or tiring. If you ever have a CF card fail, you'll be happy you don't have the whole day's worth of images on it.

Len
---
* Wherever you go, there you are. 127.0.0.1


From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: *ist-D image transfer speeds
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:28:03 -0500

have you compared battery life versus CompactFlash cards? i see that the 4GB
MicroDrive card draws 310mA when writing while most CF cards are in the 65mA
range. i'm right now using a 1GB CF card and it holds only 70 RAW images.
the alternative is to spend more and get a 2GB CF card instead.


Herb....

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: *ist-D image transfer speeds


> I can't use some PCMCIA adapters - I use Microdrives, which are fatter.




_________________________________________________________________
Groove on the latest from the hot new rock groups! Get downloads, videos, and more here. http://special.msn.com/entertainment/wiredformusic.armx




Reply via email to