i don't know where people get this idea that CF cards are fragile. there proven cases where the cards have been through all kinds of things they were never designed to and held up. all the verified cases that i know of data loss have been because of user error. lots of anecdotes and no proof. changing of cards is the number one danger to the data on them. the fewer the changes, the better.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leonard Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:36 AM Subject: Re: *ist-D image transfer speeds > There's something to be said for not putting all your eggs (images) in one > basket. Why not buy two more 1GB CF cards? Just yesterday all you could > shoot on a roll of film was 36 pictures. Changing CF cards every 70 (or > even every 35) shots is not that time consuming or tiring. If you ever have > a CF card fail, you'll be happy you don't have the whole day's worth of > images on it.