Chris, I've seen the results on two photos done with GF ... they're OK ... I suppose it depends on the kind of quality you want. Speaking for myself, nothing beats a higher resolution original. IMO, (which is usually in the minority here) resampling, in general, "lollipops"
shel Chris Brogden wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Cotty wrote: > > > without resampling unless you want to go larger than your file size will > > allow, in which case there's nothing wrong with resampling the pic right > > up to as big as you like, IMO. Resampling is not one of the seven deadly > > sins - it is a perfectly acceptable way to print larger at a decent dpi. > > What are the best tools for resampling? I've tried Photoshop 6's bicubic > process and wasn't pleased with the results. Genuine Fractals is supposed > to be quite good, but I haven't tried it. Does anyone have any stories or > opinions on resampling? > > chris
