Hello arnie,

You didn't specify that you were shooting the *istD.  Now you are in
exactly the boat I am in.  You need to be looking in the 17/19-35
range of zoom.  If your budget is less than $400, then your
best bet is the Tokina 19-35/3.5-4.5 AF193.  Here is a link:
http://www.thkphoto.com/products/tokina/afl-11.html

Of the cheaper end of the wide zooms, this one may be the best.
Anything faster is over $400.00.


Best regards,
Bruce



Sunday, December 7, 2003, 5:51:16 PM, you wrote:

a> using the istD with 360fgz, so i will need more that a 28 at the wide end

a> price range $300-$400


a> ----- Original Message ----- 
a> From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 10:03 AM
a> Subject: Re: indoor zoom


>> Hi Arnie/Bruce,
>>
>> I've got the Sigma EX 28-70 2.8. I think it's great bang for buck,
a> assuming
>> you get it mail order. In the shops here in Australia it costs way tooo
>> much, and I learnt that the hard way. I've found it really sharp at 5.6-8,
>> and the build quality's great. It also stops down to f32 if you need it.
>> Contrast and colour are good. Also the constant 2.8's a plus. However, it
>> does search a bit and it's not the quietest lens. Unless you have lots of
>> spare money around I can't think of any reason why you'd pay so much more
>> for Pentax's similar pro zoom. But I think if you're not going to be using
a> a
>> decent flash (also the popup can be too low for the prozooms shooting
a> wide),
>> you might find even 2.8 not enough, in which case you might be happier
a> with
>> maybe a couple of speedy primes.. Like Bruce says..What's your price
a> range?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ryan
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "arnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 1:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: indoor zoom
>>
>>
>> > Hello arnie,
>> >
>> > What is your price range.  If you are looking for speed, then the
>> > constant 2.8 lenses are going to be the right ticket.  However, they
>> > are also quite expensive.  Pentax and Tokina make a constant aperture
>> > 28-70/2.8 and Sigma make a constant aperture 28-70/2.8, along with a
>> > 24-70/2.8.  I can't vouch for optical or build quality on the Sigmas
>> > as I have never used them.  Perhaps someone will chime in with some
>> > experience.
>> >
>> > Bruce
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Saturday, December 6, 2003, 7:19:58 PM, you wrote:
>> >
>> > a> hey guys, i need some advice, and i've noticed little hesitancy on
a> the
>> part
>> > a> of most pdmlers to give such.
>> >
>> > a> my brother in law is getting married in 4 weeks, and i want a lens
a> that
>> will
>> > a> work well indoors. i currently have the tamron 28-200 xr 3.8-5.6 but
a> i
>> find
>> > a> the lens to be very slow for indoor use. how the 24-90? are there any
>> other
>> > a> zooms i should take a look at?
>> >
>> > a> thanks
>> >
>> > a> arnie
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>




Reply via email to