the digital medium is capable of being more than film can ever be. Grain
Surgery can match any grain you can scan and invent some you can't. other
tools can take care of the color matching problem. once you reach adequate
resolution, and there is a full frame 4x5 digital back out there that
produce 48 megapixel images, with higher than film dynamic range, 10 stops
in one exposure with the same 4x5 back, you have exceeded the capabilities
of film. can you do it at the same cost as film? of course not, until you
have made thousands of exposures. the idea of making digital look like film
is ridiculous to me because why would i want myself to be limited to only
what film can do.

Herb....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: What do you think?


> Well, Herb, we're coming at this from entirely different perspectives ...
I
> don't want to edit digital stuff through photoshop to give me something
similar
> to what I get from film.  And, frankly, it's hard for me to believe that
Grain
> Surgery will provide the wide variety of grain patterns and texture
available
> with different films, different exposures, different developers, and
different
> developing and processing techniques.  Are you suggesting that Grain
Surgery
> will give me the grain of Efke 25 processed in ID-II, or Tri-X pushed two
stops
> and processed in Acufine, or HP5+ in Rodinal 1:50?  The idea of making a
digital
> image imitate a film-based photograph just seems silly to me.
>
> As for color, well, I'm no expert, but it seems to me that the same
situation
> exists, because different films and exposures provide different degrees of
> graininess.  Will Grain Surgery deal with those difference?
>
> What seems to be happening is that the digital people want digital to be
all
> things to all people, so software is developed to get digitally captured
images
> to imitate to some degree that which film does.  Frankly, I like the
digital
> image for what it is, and the silver-based photographic image for what it
is.


Reply via email to