Len --- * There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Just one tip Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 14:46:18 +1000
I totally agree graywolf, which is why I think my "strike rate" needs
improving. At the moment, like I mentioned, I am getting probably 18
salable images from a roll of 24 exposure film. Of those, probably 4 of the
rejects are due to eyes closing/subject moving etc. The two remaining are
usually rejects due to being underexposed, or out of focus etc. Even though
the bulk of the "rejects" are usually due to the "subject did something the
photographer has no control over", I still consider this my fault as I
should be able to "predict" or at least "anticipate" these things, and make
allowances for it. I still stand by my original goal - when I get to
consistentantly producing 22 salable shots per 24 roll, I will be "happy" to
some degree with my own competency level. But until then, I still think,
basically that I'm not worthy of people's $$$$....
tan.
----- Original Message ----- From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: Re: Just one tip
> Maybe I should clarify this. I am speaking specifically about event
photography.
>
> graywolf wrote:
>
> > You were thinking of works of art, Tanya is thinking of salable
> > pictures. There is a big difference. Any pro who does not get a salable
> > picture with every shot except where the subject did something the
> > photographer has no control over is not very competent.
>
>
> --
> graywolf
> http://graywolfphoto.com
>
> "You might as well accept people as they are,
> you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Working moms: Find helpful tips here on managing kids, home, work — and yourself. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/workingmom.armx
