I agree, but the effect is extremely slight.

--
"Ask not at whom the Chimp smirks - he smirks at you."
www.smirkingchimp.com
www.gregpalast.com
www.monbiot.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 4-Jan-04 20:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Polarizer pictures, which is better, and why?
>
>
> The second one, (B+W), looked more saturated and deeper blue than the
> first to me.
>
> rg
>
>
> Alan Chan wrote:
> > This has nothing to do with Pentax, but I reckon there are some experts
> > here might be able to tell the differences. I did 2 shots this
> afternoon
> > with identical setting just to see if there was any colour difference
> > between HOYA & B+W CPL. I turned the filters until they gave
> the deepest
> > blue colour possible. These shots were done with the Canon A80
> because I
> > do not have the *ist D. Now called me naive, but I compared these 2
> > shots side by side at 100% in Photoshop, and while there is some very
> > slight colour difference (could be due to the lack of precise angle of
> > the CPLs), I would not be able to determine which is better and found
> > them equally good on my monitors. Some comments I received from other
> > forum suggested the HOYA one was slightly "fogged", while another said
> > he would buy B+W. What am I missing? Why cannot I see the difference? I
> > could "faked" their titles and tricked people to believe the HOYA was
> > B+W, and like vise, but I did not. I want some honest opinion
> here. Anyone?
> >
> > HOYA Ultra CPL:
> > http://www.pbase.com/image/24771315
> >
> > B+W CPL:
> > http://www.pbase.com/image/24771314
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan Chan
> > http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%
> 2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to