No, it's what ~I~ meant to say. I'm newish to this scanning thing, and it's entirely possible I may not know the difference between a really good scan and a lesser quality scan.
Boris Liberman wrote: > > Hi! > > >Of course, it's always possible that I can't tell a good > >scan from a poor one, or a good photograph or image from a > >poor one. > > This is something I did not say, nor meant to imply... > > <sigh> > > Boris
