Cameron Hood wrote: > Maybe the rumoured 120 Limited will be good; however, rumours are > that it, too, is a macro; not that there is anything wrong with that, but it > definitely adds to the cost, as well as the focussing speed. The Pentax FA 50/2.8 macro is the fastest autofocusing lens I've ever used. Even if it's not a macro, a Limited 120 wouldn't be cheap. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Tom Rittenhouse
- FW: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Cameron Hood
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Pål Jensen
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Cameron Hood
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) tom
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Doug Brewer
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Pål Jensen
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) dick graham
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Pål Jensen
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Cameron Hood
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) tom
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) dave o'brien
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Pentax Clover
- Re: New Pentax S-1, MZ-1 and MZ-4(2?) Paul . Stregevsky