But, the Shadow must have had something else going for it.
Everyone else with money (including Mclaren) was using that same engine. The Shadow beat everyone else in '74.
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT:Racing Movies-was:Pentaxc in the movies Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:01:16 -0500
On Mar 15, 2004, at 5:36 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Must have been aerodynamics or suspension or something, because I refuse to believe that those big Chevy V8's could move the cars as fast as that Turbo.It wasn't aerodynamics. In truth, it's not hard to make well over 1000 horsepower with a normally aspirated Chevy V8. The ports and valves are sewer size, and the chamber design allows for at least 13.5:1 compression ratio with little valve restriction. That's horsepower. The engine doesn't know it has pushrods. Hell, the world's most powerful automotive engines are pushrod engines. Top fuel drag racing engines now make around 8000 horsepower from 8 liters. That would be 8 litres to the Porsche boys <g>.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Premium includes powerful parental controls and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
