Yes - but you would still need to somehow tell the camera which film it is - unless
the camera can read the imprinted data - it might do so with the film is developed
;-). So this does not mean sense and no, Minolta can not do it either.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 08. huhtikuuta 2001 19:41
Aihe: Re: Photo Expo Japan 2001 - MZ-S and FA31Ltd
<snip>
>I really don't think so. I believe the new Minolta 7 have this feature (correct me if
>I'm wrong). The rep may not know what he is talking about (lets hope so).
>Anyway, as I understand the data imprinting feature is that it imprints the data
>while the film is rewinding (correct me if I'm wrong). This means that the camera
>must have a memory that remebers the exprosure data and frames on the film. Hence, it
>should be possible to make a system with roll memory. However, if you use data
>imprinting and use the manual method of mid roll rewind and reloading of the same
>film, then you would get double exposure of exposure data on those frame that have
>been in the camera twice. A way to avoid this is to have some roll memory function.
>Thats why this feature makes sense and seems to be connected to the data imprinting
>feature.
<snip>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
