Well, the first impression is the trees in the foreground. I think I would have tried to use the foreground more in the composition. Find some lines that point at the building, past the trees. The other option is to go closer. There are lots of interesting reflections here, and the outline of the building is not the most interesting part, so why not omit it? Some concrete part with the abstract reflections towering above it is what I would look for.

But of course, that is a very different image. This one is good, but could use some more contrast, I think, in the building.

DagT

På 5. apr. 2004 kl. 20.03 skrev Boris Liberman:

Hi!

I know I am posting a little too often. But then I haven't been
posting PAWs for quite some time before that.

Anyway - here's Mark Cassino's K 24/2.8 on Leon Altov's ME Super with
some Kodak TMAX 400 loaded in it <g>.

I have some particular question to the wizards of Land of Pentax:

You see, I've been told numerous times that this is a very good
picture. Nonetheless, I would like to hear how it can be improved
provided that I don't have wider lens than K 24/2.8...

Please notice also that I've applied some perspective correction. I've
left a little "falling" effect in, so that IMHO the impression still
would be that one is looking from below on this building...

So, I'd appreciate suggestions as to how to improve, as I am sure it
could be improved...

And now the link:

http://boris.isra-shop.com/local/paw/clal.jpg

Thanks in advance.

Boris






Reply via email to