Marnie, This works for me. The blue flower in the center is sharp on my screen. I rather like the graphic and impressionistic intrepretation. Not much different than the flower painting hanging over my couch.
Regards, Bob S. > http://members.aol.com/eactivist/pages/blurry.htm > > But it would have driven my former teacher nuts because nothing is sharp. > (The wind was blowing.) I sort of like the impressionistic feel of it. But then, > I often like things others don't, and don't think some area of super sharpness > is the primary requirement in every photo. > > So I am curious: > 1. Would the lack of real sharpness in any spot really bother you? > 2. Or if you don't like it, is that reaction unrelated to the blurriness -- > i.e. you don't like flowers, you don't like the composition, you think > something else could be better, etc. > 3. None of the above.
