Joe, I basically use it at 400 ISO and -1.5 stops. I also put a Lumiquest Softbox on it for diffusion. With that, it seems to work pretty reliably.
Bruce Monday, May 17, 2004, 5:30:15 PM, you wrote: JT> First I tried it with the AF 400T. Here's the results: JT> Normal direct TTL, definitely overexposed. JT> -1/2 EV, better but still overexposed JT> -1.0 EV, better still JT> Ceiling bounce: overall exposure is better, nearly okay. JT> Vivitar 6000 AF Macro Flash: All TTL exposures so far seem fine. JT> All tests were done at ISO 200. JT> I am disappointed with the performance of the AF 400T because I like JT> this flash. Bruce Dayton reports good performance with it on the *ist D. JT> Bruce, what am I doing wrong? JT> Has anyone gotten consistently good TTL results with any flash on the JT> *ist D? I am in the market, but hate to spend money on something that JT> may not give reliable results. JT> Thanks, JT> Joe
