On 8 Jun 2004 at 14:59, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: > on 08.06.04 14:49, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Considering it's a dedicated digital only lens I'm quite surprised that the > > chromatic aberrations are still not great at the edges and both images were > > shot at f8. > Well, they are not that bad. And I must say that from what I've seen DA > 16-45 has some CAs too (slightly bigger even than FA 24-90). On the other > side both lenses seems to be nicely sharp even in the corners.
Herein lies the key to our differences in the perception of what's sharp and what's not I guess. Did you notice that all the images were made with the contrast on hard, the saturation high and the sharpening on hard? Even discounting the CA they are dreadful examples IMHO. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
