Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
OMG! This 'discussion' again. It's nothing more than a filler. Could this topic be added to the PDML mini-FAQ ;-) ? Like:
Actually, Frantisek has a good point...graywolf, would you consider adding a cliche discussion list to your FAQ? To Frantisek's, I'd add:
zooms v primes
AF v MF
autoexposure v what it says on the inside of the kodak box
plastic v metal
diffusion v condenser enlargers (or fibre v RC, or glass v glassless carriers, and other cutting edge technologies)
which local pentax distributor is crappeir
..needless to say....this is mostly :) But on the other hand, I like the occasional cliche discussion - its like listening to the Eroica one more time. I never really get tired of it (as long as there is other chatter in between).
Obviously I'm a bit bored tonight while my scanner sloooowly scans these negs.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc
http://derby.agreatserver.com/ (galleries)
http://derby.150m.com/ (blog)