What part of "mini", didn't you understand. There are photographic encyclopedias
out there with all that information in them.
--
Derby Chang wrote:
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
OMG! This 'discussion' again. It's nothing more than a filler. Could
this topic be added to the PDML mini-FAQ ;-) ? Like:
Actually, Frantisek has a good point...graywolf, would you consider
adding a cliche discussion list to your FAQ? To Frantisek's, I'd add:
zooms v primes
AF v MF
autoexposure v what it says on the inside of the kodak box
plastic v metal
diffusion v condenser enlargers (or fibre v RC, or glass v glassless
carriers, and other cutting edge technologies)
which local pentax distributor is crappeir
..needless to say....this is mostly :) But on the other hand, I like the
occasional cliche discussion - its like listening to the Eroica one more
time. I never really get tired of it (as long as there is other chatter
in between).
Obviously I'm a bit bored tonight while my scanner sloooowly scans these
negs.
D
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
