A couple of weeks later I opened it up again, and it did the same thing it did before, inexplicably expand to an ever larger object, always with sharp edges.
Since I couldn't figure any use for it, nor was there an education to be derived from it *on my own*, I dumped it.
I do that when I have something without an owner's manual, and I can't figure it out for myself.
But, I liked it! <g>
keith whaley
Caveman wrote:
I also remember posting some time ago a 4 pixels image that enlarges well to any size, all with nice sharp edges. Nobody cared. So maybe I should sign "Cavewoman", then you guys will pay attention.
;-)
Steve Desjardins wrote:
But Christian, we like Tan better than you so we believe her more easily. <vbg>.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/14/2004 2:31:11 PM >>>
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote on 9/14/2004, 2:12 PM:
> > I have been receiving back a few orders this week. I was very > apprehensive > when I had three separate brides all order 20x30 inch prints from me, and > was really worried about the results. > > Well, tv talked me through the resizing process, and I am happy to say > that > these are quite possibly the best prints I have ever produced. > > Clients ecstatic, photographer impressed, what more is there to say? I > love > this camera, despite its faults. It is going great guns for me! > > Who would've thought? 20x30 inch, 300 dpi prints from a 6.1mp camera?!?! > Larger sensor, schmensor!! Now the only thing that means to me is more > space taken up on my HDD! 6.1mp will do me just fine... > > Anyone else agree? Disagree? For what reasons?
I've been screaming this for the past few months. I have some 20x30 prints that are amazing.
