Youre still not clear, what is the "theorethical maximum SNR of a
DSLR/SCANNER at lowest ISO" mean according to you?
Use said "theoretical" which usually does involve mathematics and
abstraction and is exactly what you were comparing the real hardware
against!
JCO


-----Original Message-----
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: USAF target and resolution tests


why isn't it clear we are talking about real pieces of hardware and not
some mathematical abstraction? i've spent a lot of time doing the
mathematics of information theory and i know the difference between a
noisy channel and an ideal channel.

Herb...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: USAF target and resolution tests


> You posted """no scanner or DSLR Shel's been looking at have SNRs 
> appreciably less than the theoretical maximum at their lowest ISO.""
>
> Maybe I misunderstood you, What exactly did you mean by that if you 
> think I somehow twisted it into meaning something else??


Reply via email to