Shel, the most meaningful advice I can give is, get a Wacom tablet or similar if you don't have one.
Doing such fix with a mouse would be a huge nightmare. j On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:57:06 -0800, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I really wasn't looking for automated tools. There are a number of > techniques that one may use in PS that go beyond the simple use of clone, > healing brush, and patch tool. I was hoping there might be some options > I'd overlooked or am not familiar with, like Katrin Eismann's "Float and > Move" technique (which is pretty difficult and time consuming on this > particular image) or the relatively obscure "Healing with a Pattern" > technique, which I couldn't get to work worth a damn on this particular > image. > > It's a tricky bit of work since I'm not well skilled, and the need to > preserve fine detail and match grain patterns precludes a lot of options. > You should see what the entire image looks like! Anyway, this puppy better > be worth it ... well, it is for me because I'm learning and because I like > the photo on several levels. > > Shel > > > [Original Message] > > From: Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I agree with Jostien, I don't think that you're going to get better > > results using any automated tools. > > -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
