Rob Studdert Wrote: <Do you seriously think that film manufacturers are going to keep non-profitable film production lines on ice for those people across the globe who still don't have electricity (let alone the ability to afford cameras/film/processing or prints)? >
Answer: I do not think so, and that wasn’t my point. I do think that there is going to be a need for film for many years to come. And the reason for that is that only 5 percent of all people on this planet have a computer and access to the Internet. And what you probably didn’t even think about is that film based cameras still is the most spread camera type on this planet, by far. /Joakim -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 14 december 2004 15:06 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: Re: SV: The film is dead On 14 Dec 2004 at 13:49, Joakim Johansson wrote: > If we think about it for a second, it may strike us that the digital > revolution is nothing but an easy summer breeze. In a global perspective > that is. > > Still most people around the world doesn’t even has electricity, and > therefore certainly no DLSR.s. I don’t think the film is dead! I think you'll find that low end (but capable) digital cameras will very quickly become more cost effective than film cameras and all film but those destined for a for few niche markets will die out. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.778 / Virus Database: 525 - Release Date: 2004-10-15 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.778 / Virus Database: 525 - Release Date: 2004-10-15
