"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I don't consider the Epson 2200 expensive. I believe it sells for >> less than $400 US. None of my prints show any signs of fading, and >> some are hanging in sunlit rooms. I did make some prints with an >> Epson 1200 that have faded a bit after five or six years. But the >> 2200 seems to be as archival as the promos claim. > >Is the 2200 using pigmented inks or dyes?
Pigment. The new Ultrachrome inks, which have a much wider gamut than earlier pigment inks. Really quite spectacular. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
