I got a telescope for Christmas with a camera adaptor. I've not had much chance to play with it yet but was quite impressed with its power the first couple of times I used it. It's a Telstar 900x114 reflector, and fills the eyepiece with the moon with the 20mm objective. Strangely the moon is even larger when using the shorter focal length 4mm eyepiece, which I haven't quite worked out yet.
When looking at a group of stars (Seven Sisters) there are many more visible than with the naked eye, even here in light polluted London. Unfortunately when I put the camera adaptor on with the *istD I couldn't see anything - it was far too dark to focus. A bit disappointing. I haven't tried the camera with the moon yet, but will do next time it makes an appearance, and it's not raining, or cloudy. Nick -----Original Message----- From: "Tom C"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 11/01/05 23:45:05 To: "pentax-discuss@pdml.net"<pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Subject: Re: *istD EOL... Bruce, I'm curious why the shop people thought the Digital Rebel was junk. Was it based on look and feel ? What about image quality? I'm asking because right now the Rebel is the top selling DLSR for astrophotography. I haven't had a chance to try the *ist D yet with my telescope, but depending on results I get with the *ist D I wouldn't mind trying the Rebel. Tom C. >From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >To: Nick Clark <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: *istD EOL... >Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:33:08 -0800 > >I was in my local shop yesterday - mostly Nikon and Pentax, some >Canon. They are selling about five D70's everyday. People just keep >walking in a buying them. They think highly of the *istDS, but it >doesn't sell anywhere like the D70. Pretty much the word is out in >all media that photographers and would be photographers that the D70 >is THE camera to buy. Pop Photography proclaimed it Camera of the >Year. Size doesn't matter to most people at the time of purchase. >Later on, when having to carry the extra they might care, but it is >too late. The best Pentax can do with the *istDS is be respected. My >shop thinks the DRebel is junk next to the DS and they are very >willing to tell any potential customers. But they are really making >their money on the D70. It could well be the camera that saved >Nikon's hide. > >-- >Best regards, >Bruce > > >Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 3:18:50 PM, you wrote: > >NC> My local dedicated Camera shop says the *istDs isn't selling. >NC> They have it and the 300d and D70 (and the Minolta which is >NC> humungous) on display alongside each other. Even though the Pentax >NC> is smaller, they say the reasons people don't go for it are partly >NC> the SD card but mostly the difference in price. The 300d is >NC> something like GBP200 cheaper. > >NC> Nick > > >NC> -----Original Message----- >NC> From: "Pål Jensen"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >NC> I think it will be more than enough. As high-end DSLR are >NC> larger than medium format cameras, and consequently suffers from >NC> the same lack of portability, the market niche is definitely >NC> there. Mind you, Pentax need to design cameras that look small, >NC> not only are small. The problem with the *istD(S) is that they >NC> look big. Products that are going to sell on their smallness need >NC> to comunicate their size through design. Small cars don't look >NC> like shrinked big ones. If they did they wouldn't sell. The small >NC> SLR's of the past looked small without any reference. Pentax M >NC> series and Olympus OM's had a slim smallish look whereas the >NC> *istD(S) look big and fat until you actually handle one or see a >NC> photo of it next to the competition. Since most people never see >NC> or handle a Pentax theres nothing telling them how small they are >NC> unless they do a lot of homework. >NC> The Pentax 40mm pancake lens is agreat idea. It is a pity >NC> though that Pentax haven't made a pancake camera. > > >NC> Pål > > > > > > > >