<ROTFLMAO> Have you met JCO?
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > Date: 1/23/2005 8:00:41 PM > Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain > > TriX looks like what it does because of the defects of Tri-X > film. No digital camera I know of has been designed to produce a > photograph with defects emulating Tri-X. > > Define a "digital look". If you mean grainless, clean > photographs, you are not defining a digital look; you're saying > what film is supposed to be trying to produce. > > Godfrey > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That's just about the most absurd comment I've read here > > recently ... there > > is a definite look to digital images when they come out of the > > camera. > > Then, after you muck around with them in Photoshop and > > whatever, they may > > take on a different look. Show me a digital camera that will > > produce Tri-X > > tonality and grain structure right out of the box. Perhaps > > you meant to > > say that a digital image can BE MADE to look like anything ... > > > > > > Shel > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a "digital look". A digital image > > can > > > look like anything, including a perfect emulation of > > whatever > > > grain floats your boat. > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? > http://my.yahoo.com
