On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:38:42 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've found the LX autoexposure extremely accurate. Of course in situations > that aren't neutral, exposure compensation must be applied. That's true of > any exposure system. > Paul
Maybe it's my sample, then. I've taken a photo where the indicator says (for instance) 1/30th, and it sounds like the shutter is open ~waaaay~ longer than that. So, so be certain, I'll take another one, same scene, same vantage point, same lens, same framing same everything. The second exposure "sounds" about right. When I get the contacts back, the first one is (as expected) way overexposed, the second, more or less fine. Maybe it's a flaw that my body has, but it's happened enough that I've stopped relying on auto exposure. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
