Thanks ... Anyone have example shots from the F/FA100-300mm?
Godfrey
On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm quite fond of the lens. Although I use primes for serious long lens work, I like the 80/320 for walkarounds. I've posted a couple shots from it previously, but I'll reference them again. This shot is handheld of a moving subject at 320 with continuous autofocus:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813285
This guy is at 200 or thereabouts, handheld: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3139464&size=lg
I've seen references to the 80-320 on DPReview and have seen some impressive pictures with it. How does it perform relative to the F100-300/4.5-5.6 that I've also seen? And compared to the A-70-210/4?
As posted recently mine performs as well if not better than the A 70-210 @
200mm but I've never tried the F100-300. There seems to be some issues, some
people report very good performance others not so good. I'm also quite
satisfied with performance at 320mm. FWIW mine's black and made in Japan.
John
