Scott Loveless mused: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:06:42 -0500, frank theriault > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:03:48 -0500, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > <snip> > > > (As if ten percent of my posts are anywhere near on topic <G>). > > > > 10% on-topic posts? That puts you waaaay ahead of the list average! <vbg> > > > > Way to go. > > > > cheers, > > frank > > > Thanks, Frank. Here's the Noob's Guide to the PDML. > > There are four possible conversations at any given time: > 1. Digital technobabble. This starts out as a discussion about the > *istD/DS and deteriorates to speculation about a digital MF from > Pentax. > 2. All other technobabble. This starts out as a problem with, or > question about, a specific Pentax product and deteriorates to > speculation about a digital MF from Pentax. > 3. PAW, PESO, GESO, etc. These will degrade, usually gracefully, to > technobabble about the photo or the equipment used to take the > picture. See #1 and #2. > 4. Off Topic. The list is ~90% off topic. Frank thinks it's higher.
You forgot the chemical technobabble where people *still* talk about just what developer, or what temperature, or how long to agitate, or the age and/or species of the sacrificial virgin ... And the "what is street photography" rambling ...
