Godfrey and I may do some comparison testing between the K135/2.5 and a
contemporary equivalent (F or FA 135/2.8 I think).  There's much more to
determining the quality of a lens than testing data (MTF, LPMM, etc). 
Right now I'm looking for a couple of older lenses for the Leica because
they have certain optical qualities that are not found in newer glass, but,
by the same token, I regret having sold my 43mm Ltd and would like to get a
77mm Ltd as well some day.

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: Don Sanderson 

> Collate all the data you want, fact is if I were to sell all
> my SMCP-A lenses right now I would get between 300 and 800
> percent of what I paid for them over the last 3 years.
> That shows: 1.) They are sought after by many. 2.) The 'many'
> can't have them, I've compared them to their AF brethren and
> have chosen to sell the AF versions because, dollar for dollar
> some of the older glass just plain kicks butt!
> I would say a head to head, hands on comparison is about as
> fair a test as you can do wouldn't you?
> The market HAS decided, some old glass is great stuff, which
> has yet to be 'replaced' in AF versions at an affordable price
> point.
>
> Don
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Quasi Modo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 8:22 AM
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: I'm surprised that this one didn't attract a single bid
> >
> >
> > Let the market decide, Shel.   If you want to collect lenses and that
> > floats your boat, by all means do.   But the only delusions are indeed
> > yours if you think a) they're consistently and noticably superior
> > optically to their younger AF siblings and b) they're worthy
> > investments.   By all means collate the relevant data as you see it,
> > talk to someone who actually designs lenses for a living, preferably
> > with the company concerned, learn the history and find yourself
> > completely debunked as I did.
> >
> > Anyway we're here to learn not impose idiosyncratic mindsets but if it
> > were larger items such as older cars the (de)merits of collection
> > become immediately apparent.


Reply via email to