I understand what your saying, but RAW is also euphemistically referred to
as a digital negative, and futher processing is implicit, where the same is
not true of transparencies, in general.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:57:41 +0000
> Now in the digital world, RAW is all the rage, but precisely for many of
the
> opposite reasons transparency was predominantly viewed as good.
In truth, RAW is all the rage for many of the same reasons that
transparencies are embraced. The RAW image is your basic unadulterated
information. Digital jpegs or tiffs are processed by the camera software to
default standards. It's something like having your negatives processed in a
mini-lab that never tweaks the settings on the machine.
Paul
