Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I agree. And earlier today I pointed out how silly these discussions have become. The message you cited was in response to a message from Shel that was obviously meant to provoke. In any case, I am over it as well.
Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Frantisek wrote:
I have "gotten over it", but I would rather like to discuss how to better
one's technique in either digital or darkroom printing, but these
discussions often turn into such as this one... It's indeed apples and
oranges, in my opinion both can look good but are different. That's why my gentle
reminder.
Still with all respect, Frantisek
Sunday, May 1, 2005, 8:41:34 PM, Paul wrote: PS> It's obviously an opinion Frantisek. Get over it. PS> On May 1, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Frantisek wrote:
PS> Digital compares favorably with a good film image. No, in fact, a
6.1
PS> megapixel digital image is better than almost any 35mm film image.
Paul, "in fact"? Who made you the judge of that? Please remember what
are the IMHO and YMMV abbrevs for.
With all other respect but sorry, this again ticks me off, Frantisek
