Hey, can you guys change the subject line of this thread? please? :-) Christian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:22 PM Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
> i have much more than Paul has, 1.2 terabyte RAID array. i've always stored > my slide and RAW images at about 60-70 megabytes whenever possible. some > images have been cropped or otherwise are not suitable for double resolution > are stored at native resolution. the slide scans are native at 60-70 > megabytes. > > why would anyone not store up res version? all of the processing has been > done already. i've abandoned CD and DVD backup because they cost more and > are much slower for large amounts of backup and restore. everything is on > the RAID array and backed up to external drives of sufficient size, right > now, a pair of 500GB drives. when the RAID exceeds 500GB of used space, > there are 1TB and 1.6TB external drives to use. if i really wanted to, i > could replace the 250G drives in the array with 400GB drives. > > Herb... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:16 PM > Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long > > > > Yes I understood that, I was just suprised that the res-ed up pic was what > > he > > chose to store as his archive version. It seems as if he must own a disk > > drive > > company. > > >
