On 5/25/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought you were the anti-focus league leader, Frank :)... Kidding, > sorry...
Well, I wouldn't say I'm the leader, but focus isn't as important to me as it seems to be for others. To put it another way, a strong enough image that missed focus will often work for me, where others might find it intolerable (I'm talking about images generally, not just my own). > > Excellent. I am kinda glad that for once my photo did not work for you... It had to happen some time. <vbg> > > I suppose quite many soft focus images are controversial, which is a > good thing, don't you agree? I don't know that controversy for its own sake is a good or bad thing. I've liked several of the other soft photos that you've shown. One that stands out is a restaurant shot (I think), of an empty chair and table by a window. I recall the very strong geometries, especially of the rectangular window frames. > > Thanks for your comment. No problem. <g> cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
