From: "Pål Jensen"
> I don'æt agree. I'll rather be without features I use once a year.
Features cost money or have other drawbacks like higher power consumption. I
like features that are being used regularly and are useful and don't want to
pay for seldomly used features. Nor do I want to carry dead weight; that is
features that increases thei weight but seldomly or never used.
Sure, but that is your knowledge about photo, but it is the average ?
> You seem to forget that small size are features as well as any and that
many of us have no interest in a feature count competition. The features you
mention don't do anything for me getting better images. You also seem to
forget that the extra 1,5 fps rate At a speed at 1/1000s you'll gain only
1,5/1000 of the action compared to the MZ-S. You'll still miss 996/1000 of
the action with 4fps compared to the MZ-S 997,5/1000 - hardly a big
difference.
Of course small side is important, that is why I own a MZ-3
I need to say this !
By talking about MZ-S with all the list, I get agree it is a very good SLR
But, it is also a SLR with missing features for me and have extra features I
do not need
Second, sometimes, I do express what average people wish because the most of
the sold SLR are not due to Pro but users who gets a SLR for his pleasure,
his proud ! Not his use in photography
My point of vue is that the MZ-S is a very good SLR, but compare to my MZ-3,
it is very expensive (I paid my MZ-3 its half price)
So there is some difficulties I need to fight in order to realize how much
the MZ-S is a SLR I need.
At last, I go on hoping Pentax makes a F-100 like (remember a PZ-1p is quite
as big)
Also Hope my Bank will not call me because of buying the MZ-S
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
