NO the original poster claimed that EBAY auctions were a different way to buy things and because they were auctions the buyer was "taking his chances" and has no right to refunds or renegoiations UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES simply because it was an auction. He then LATER chanced his position to only mean subjective things were not arguable, which is MY position on the matter, but that WAS NOT what he orginally stated or meant and that was clear. He still stands on the position that if the seller was ignorant ( not lying, just dumb ) on factual matters, that's O.K. Too and the buyer should be screwed because it was an "auction" sale and this is what I was posting about in my recent posts... Because I STRONGLY disagree... jco
-----Original Message----- From: Frantisek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 5:39 AM To: J. C. O'Connell Subject: Re: Opinions wanted, ebay item condition Thursday, June 16, 2005, 1:00:07 AM, J. wrote: JCOC> I am tired of arguing with you. You must be JCOC> from another planet or something if you think It seems it's you from another planet... Always arguing, always ad hominem, always missing the point of discussion (do you understand that it was about _subjective_ assesment of condition?!?) Frantisek
