Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hey you guys have been using digital for more than a couple of years. By now >> you >> should be able to tell what kind of coverage a given lens has on an istD, >> Ds, Dl >> without having to compair it to film cameras. > >Well, maybe some "have been using digital for more than a couple of years". >However, some of us are newer at APS digital, and some of us (e.g., ~I~) >are still "film-bound", so I think that the comparisons are still both >valid and useful, at least here on the PDML (even if individual personal >practice may make such "intracerebral translations" obsolete).
The comparisons are also very useful to those of us who still use film in *addition* to digital. (Heresy, I know...) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com