well, i haven't found much difference between the images. my judgement was determined mostly by white balance. i believe to really see the difference in dof, one should should with either significantly longer focal lengths, or, take pics of things at closer distances (that is, macro).
best, mishka On 7/22/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A number of people have determined for themselves which photo was made with > the digi and which was made with the film SLR. Some were wrong in their > assessments ... > > I'm not saying Mishka is right or wrong ... the comment just reminded me of > the mistaken identifications. A few people have made comments to indicate > that they thought they knew which pic was the digi, but didn't identify the > image, so it's unknown if they were correct in their assessment. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/2818.html > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Mishka > > > digital lens seems to eliminate the bystanders from the frame. > > very cool (and useful) feature (unless you are doing street > photography...) > > > > best, > > mishka > > > > On 7/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Yep. That was predictable. Virtually the same perspective. More DOF > from the 18 and digital. But also less edge distortion and better edge > sharpness. Of course the lack of white balance control renders the film > image a bit murky, so it's a little tough to compare in some respects. (Not > to mention that they're itty-bitty web images.) > > >
