On Aug 21, 2005, at 7:00 PM, Unca Mikey wrote:
Hhmmmm. Godfrey, when I load http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/
photo/PAW5/, I don't get much detail in the small gray blocks. In
fact, no detail, just small gray blocks, LOL. Nothing in the
blocks allows me to differentiate one image from another. After I
have viewed an image, the border is red, which confuses your
statement that the "red block is always the latest week
posted." (No, my browser's normal color for viewed links is not
red.) Now that I have viewed many images, there are many blocks
that have red borders.
This is probably getting too detailed and arcane for most PDML
readers, but: older images have a solid gray block. If I have
viewed the image, it has a red border; if not, it has a black
border. The block (and border) for the current week (33) is solid
red. The blocks for weeks not yet done are a lighter gray, with a
visible grid in the small block; all these future blocks have a red
border.
They're supposed to be small, gray blocks without a border. Un-
available links should be a light gray stipple pattern with black
border, the "current" block should be red. I normally use the Safari
browser, which renders them as the HTML is coded. You can tell that
the link they each point to has changed by running the mouse over
each one and looking at the link status line at the bottom of the
window (if you have that viewable) ... the URL will change as you go
one to the next with the mouse. Subtle, perhaps too subtle. ;-)
FireFox puts the "link activation" border around them, even though I
believe I have code in there to display no border. I consider this a
FireFox bug. I wonder if there's some non-destructive way to stop it
from doing that. They display as intended in both Safari and MS
Internet Explorer.
I was able to match up the images, however, so yes, now I can see
they are the same set of images. No problem there.
I'm using Firefox on an iMac G5, OS 10.4.1, if that makes any
difference. I can do a screen shot and send it to you if it would
help.
I'm on Mac OS X v10.4.2 with FireFox, Safari, and Internet Explorer
installed. (I think I have Opera on here too...) I can see what
you're saying, but FireFox is not displaying the pages the way
they're supposed to display, given the HTML. Internet Explorer and
Safari both do a better job and display them as intended. I'll see if
there's any way to correct the display in FireFox that doesn't ruin
it in the other two.
Thanks for the comments!
Godfrey
