Fred wrote on 22.08.05 13:23: > I wonder if there might possibly be some internal electronics updating, > too. After all, dpreview.com fussed so much about the JPG quality of both > the D and the DS, right? > > "While there isn't a noticeable resolution advantage shooting RAW the final > image output is certainly sharper than JPEG from the camera. This is > interesting as one thing we have observed with *ist D JPEG's straight from > the camera is their softness." > > "Because of its target market the *ist DS is likely to be used mostly by > people shooting JPEG, as we've demonstrated on earlier pages of this review > there's a vast difference in resolution and detail between JPEG and RAW and > it's obvious therefore that a lot of the detail captured by the sensor is > lost by the in-camera processing if you shoot JPEG." > > Maybe the DS2 might be improved in this regard? One never knows. At least until someone will get his hands and eye on it ;-)
-- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
